Difference between revisions of "Talk:Glossary"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
You can see that I also created a "glossary" template that links all the glossary terms back to the main glossary page. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 17:42, 10 Jul 2005 (EDT) | You can see that I also created a "glossary" template that links all the glossary terms back to the main glossary page. --[[User:Lbstone|Lbstone]] 17:42, 10 Jul 2005 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | Certain terms don't seem to warrant a link to their own page. For example, film advance and lens barrel - what more is needed to descibe these terms than their one line descriptions? It seems bombastic to have a page saying exactly the same thing and nothing more. Perhaps we should put some thought into what terms really need a whole page of description and for which one, short sentance is enough. | ||
+ | --[[User:Mhtaylor|Mhtaylor]] 14:18, 19 Jul 2005 (EDT) |
Revision as of 18:18, 19 July 2005
It would be nice if there was a one sentence description after each of these terms. That way this will be a real glossary page that can be skimmed and understood without needing to click to the larger encyclopedic pages for each term. --Lbstone 21:09, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
- THANKS Randem! --Lbstone 11:59, 10 Jul 2005 (EDT)
I've added a bunch of terms in here. These are all terms that I found from existing articles. To see which articles I got them from, you can click on the term then follow the "what links here" link on the left of the page. --Lbstone 17:42, 10 Jul 2005 (EDT)
You can see that I also created a "glossary" template that links all the glossary terms back to the main glossary page. --Lbstone 17:42, 10 Jul 2005 (EDT)
Certain terms don't seem to warrant a link to their own page. For example, film advance and lens barrel - what more is needed to descibe these terms than their one line descriptions? It seems bombastic to have a page saying exactly the same thing and nothing more. Perhaps we should put some thought into what terms really need a whole page of description and for which one, short sentance is enough. --Mhtaylor 14:18, 19 Jul 2005 (EDT)