Difference between revisions of "Talk:GSK-99"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (page title) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Page title == | == Page title == | ||
Because Konishiroku was not the only manufacturer, and because of the Rokuoh-sha vs Konishiroku problem, I'd rather use a different title for the page. What about "GSK-99" or "Type 99 Ultra Small Aerial Camera (GSK-99)" or a variation on this? --[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 08:27, 18 July 2010 (EDT) | Because Konishiroku was not the only manufacturer, and because of the Rokuoh-sha vs Konishiroku problem, I'd rather use a different title for the page. What about "GSK-99" or "Type 99 Ultra Small Aerial Camera (GSK-99)" or a variation on this? --[[User:Rebollo fr|rebollo_fr]] 08:27, 18 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Adrien...couldn't agree more..when I started the page I thought there was just Rokuoh-sha / Konishiroku with some sub-production. I think just GSK-99 is perfect! as I have no admin roghts I could not fix that..--[[GitzoCollector|Dirk]] 18 Jul 23:13 GMT+10 | ||
Revision as of 13:13, 18 July 2010
Tōkyō Kōgaku version
I have also a Tōkyō Kogaku built GSK-99 and will re-photograph both on a same grey background with detailed shots later this week and will then update the webpage here. Added by GitzoCollector on Jul. 13, 2010.
Page title
Because Konishiroku was not the only manufacturer, and because of the Rokuoh-sha vs Konishiroku problem, I'd rather use a different title for the page. What about "GSK-99" or "Type 99 Ultra Small Aerial Camera (GSK-99)" or a variation on this? --rebollo_fr 08:27, 18 July 2010 (EDT)
- Adrien...couldn't agree more..when I started the page I thought there was just Rokuoh-sha / Konishiroku with some sub-production. I think just GSK-99 is perfect! as I have no admin roghts I could not fix that..--Dirk 18 Jul 23:13 GMT+10
