Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fujifilm QuickSnap"
m (Responded.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
indeed, why not... [[Konica Single Use Cameras]] ... I just need get round to photographing most of them.. ;-) --[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 04:09, 23 February 2011 (PST) | indeed, why not... [[Konica Single Use Cameras]] ... I just need get round to photographing most of them.. ;-) --[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 04:09, 23 February 2011 (PST) | ||
:Thanks for fixing that Fuji link for me. I should have caught that. [[User:HaarFager|HaarFager]] 04:17, 23 February 2011 (PST) | :Thanks for fixing that Fuji link for me. I should have caught that. [[User:HaarFager|HaarFager]] 04:17, 23 February 2011 (PST) | ||
| + | ::no worries...got any Konica Disposables in your collection? I have a few, but some other weird ones, will upload soon(ish) and add to the pages.. I think that a syetmatic description of the single use caneras is well and truly overdue...they are going to be ephemera and thus eventually signficant--[[User:Heritagefutures|Heritagefutures]] 04:19, 23 February 2011 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 12:19, 23 February 2011
indeed, why not... Konica Single Use Cameras ... I just need get round to photographing most of them.. ;-) --Heritagefutures 04:09, 23 February 2011 (PST)
- Thanks for fixing that Fuji link for me. I should have caught that. HaarFager 04:17, 23 February 2011 (PST)
- no worries...got any Konica Disposables in your collection? I have a few, but some other weird ones, will upload soon(ish) and add to the pages.. I think that a syetmatic description of the single use caneras is well and truly overdue...they are going to be ephemera and thus eventually signficant--Heritagefutures 04:19, 23 February 2011 (PST)
