Difference between revisions of "Talk:Daitoh"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (→1967?: answer) |
(→1967?: OK) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The point of the article is to prove that the Grace Six was not made by Daitoh, and that it was attributed to this company by someone who made a confusion with the Daitoh Grace. I have reworded to make it temptatively clearer, but it is maybe obscure for someone who does not have {{McKeown}}. Maybe you can polish this a little. --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 06:17, 9 August 2006 (EDT) | :The point of the article is to prove that the Grace Six was not made by Daitoh, and that it was attributed to this company by someone who made a confusion with the Daitoh Grace. I have reworded to make it temptatively clearer, but it is maybe obscure for someone who does not have {{McKeown}}. Maybe you can polish this a little. --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 06:17, 9 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Now it makes sense. Thank you. -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 06:26, 9 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:26, 9 August 2006
1967?
I don't have McKeown, but the description of the camera doesn't make it sound as if it was made in 1967. A typo, perhaps? -- Hoary 05:58, 9 August 2006 (EDT)
- The point of the article is to prove that the Grace Six was not made by Daitoh, and that it was attributed to this company by someone who made a confusion with the Daitoh Grace. I have reworded to make it temptatively clearer, but it is maybe obscure for someone who does not have McKeown. Maybe you can polish this a little. --Rebollo fr 06:17, 9 August 2006 (EDT)
- Now it makes sense. Thank you. -- Hoary 06:26, 9 August 2006 (EDT)
