|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | I don't see the point of personal opinion pieces like the one that 165.155.112.1 put in here. I don't believe that is the focus of this website. If I'm wrong, let me know. Otherwise, I vote to eliminate the update made by 165.155.112.1 from the entry.
| |
| − | --[[User:Phule|phule]] 16:50, 3 Aug 2005 (EDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | ----
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Per my mention above, I've removed the text. It is pasted below:
| |
| − | --[[User:Phule|phule]] 17:29, 8 Aug 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ''Were there any greater cameras? I have owned at various times the RTS, 137MD,167 MT. I currently own the Aria, RX, S2 and 139Q. I love each and every one of them -- so much so that I won't be moving to digital anytime soon. I also loved the fact that you could buy a Yashica camera or lenses and interchange without adaptors with Contax. I have always felt there was something lovely and "Old School" about that fact. By the way I added to the above listing the RX II which was released for sale in Europe only and was sans the DFI. Supposedly the viewfinder was 20% brighter than the original RX. These cameras all exhude quality and they make photographing even more of a pleasure than it is. VDP''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ----
| |
