Difference between revisions of "Talk:Carl Zeiss"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (about deep linking to Wikimedia Commons) |
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (Qatari antelope lens) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I have removed the picture that was added to this page because deep linking to an image hosted in Wikimedia Commons is not allowed (unless Flickr): see [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:First_steps/Reuse#Embedding_Commons_media_in_third_party_projects this page at Wikimedia Commons]. Any other image deep linked to Wikimedia Commons needs to be removed. | I have removed the picture that was added to this page because deep linking to an image hosted in Wikimedia Commons is not allowed (unless Flickr): see [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:First_steps/Reuse#Embedding_Commons_media_in_third_party_projects this page at Wikimedia Commons]. Any other image deep linked to Wikimedia Commons needs to be removed. | ||
--[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 20:40, 10 November 2006 (EST) | --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 20:40, 10 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Qatari antelope lens == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hello Uwe, | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have heard of the "Qatari antelope lens", but it would be good to provide a link pointing to some source. Otherwise a good number of readers will believe that this is a joke and use it to "prove" that "wiki-sites-are-bad-because-so-many-people-can-enter-unverified-information". | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 12:45, 3 December 2006 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:45, 3 December 2006
Deep linking an image from Wikimedia Commons
I have removed the picture that was added to this page because deep linking to an image hosted in Wikimedia Commons is not allowed (unless Flickr): see this page at Wikimedia Commons. Any other image deep linked to Wikimedia Commons needs to be removed. --Rebollo fr 20:40, 10 November 2006 (EST)
Qatari antelope lens
Hello Uwe,
I have heard of the "Qatari antelope lens", but it would be good to provide a link pointing to some source. Otherwise a good number of readers will believe that this is a joke and use it to "prove" that "wiki-sites-are-bad-because-so-many-people-can-enter-unverified-information".
--Rebollo fr 12:45, 3 December 2006 (EST)
