Difference between revisions of "Model Camerawiki pages"

From Camera-wiki.org
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (cat)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
*[[Fujica GW690]] - Right amount of detail, photo layout not too cluttered. Flow of the prose is not the smoothest, but doesn't interfere with content.
 
*[[Fujica GW690]] - Right amount of detail, photo layout not too cluttered. Flow of the prose is not the smoothest, but doesn't interfere with content.
 
*[[Rollekonter]] - typical systematical article about the full history of one certain Japanese [[TLR]] - of course by [[User:rebollo_fr]].
 
*[[Rollekonter]] - typical systematical article about the full history of one certain Japanese [[TLR]] - of course by [[User:rebollo_fr]].
 +
[[Category:contents]]

Latest revision as of 15:10, 10 September 2012

I would like to populate this with a list of pages that are complete, attractive, and well-structured. These are intended as models for future authors to follow; and perhaps to serve as "featured articles." This means that photo permissions should all be checked and complete, the page formatting is neat and consistent, and the information is presented clearly (and when possible with sources noted).

  • Fujica GW690 - Right amount of detail, photo layout not too cluttered. Flow of the prose is not the smoothest, but doesn't interfere with content.
  • Rollekonter - typical systematical article about the full history of one certain Japanese TLR - of course by User:rebollo_fr.