Difference between revisions of "Konica Minolta Dimage A200"
m (cat) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Reviews of the A200: | Reviews of the A200: | ||
* megapixel.net: http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loader.pl?p=http%3A//www.megapixel.net/reviews/minolta-a200/a200-review.html | * megapixel.net: http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loader.pl?p=http%3A//www.megapixel.net/reviews/minolta-a200/a200-review.html | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Known issues and work-around | Known issues and work-around | ||
| Line 17: | Line 15: | ||
* bulb mode at 30 seconds only | * bulb mode at 30 seconds only | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category: Japanese digital]] |
[[Category: Konica Minolta|Dimage A200]] | [[Category: Konica Minolta|Dimage A200]] | ||
[[Category: K]] | [[Category: K]] | ||
[[Category: M|Minolta Dimage A200]] | [[Category: M|Minolta Dimage A200]] | ||
[[Category: D|Dimage A200]] | [[Category: D|Dimage A200]] | ||
Revision as of 20:19, 29 May 2007
The Konica Minolta Dimage A200 won one of the DIMA 2005 Shoot-outs Awards: http://kmpi.konicaminolta.us/eprise/main/kmpi/content/about/AboutusNewsList.
Reviews of the A200:
- megapixel.net: http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loader.pl?p=http%3A//www.megapixel.net/reviews/minolta-a200/a200-review.html
Known issues and work-around
- grainy EVF not useful for manual focus
- slow, and sometimes wrong, focusing at low light
- aggressive noise reduction? <shoot raw and use third-party noise reduction software>
- unsatisfactory camera processing? <compare raw and extra fine and decide>
Minor issues:
- no landscape exposure mode <use manual focusing ring to set at infinity>
- bulb mode at 30 seconds only
