Difference between revisions of "Konica Minolta Dimage A200"

From Camera-wiki.org
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Reviews of A200
 
Reviews of A200
  
- megapixel.net http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loader.pl?p=http%3A//www.megapixel.net/reviews/minolta-a200/a200-review.html
+
- megapixel.net
 +
http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loader.pl?p=http%3A//www.megapixel.net/reviews/minolta-a200/a200-review.html
  
 
more review links later
 
more review links later
 +
 +
known issues and work-around
 +
- grainy EVF not useful for manual focus
 +
- slow, and sometimes wrong, focusing at low light
 +
- aggressive noise reduction? <shoot raw and use third-party noise reduction software>
 +
- unsatisfactory camera processing? <compare raw and extra fine and decide>
 +
 +
 +
minor issues:
 +
- no landscape exposure mode <use manual focusing ring to set at infinity>
 +
- bulb mode at 30 seconds only

Revision as of 15:44, 4 March 2005

Konical Minolta Dimage A200 won one of the DIMA 2005 Shoot-outs Awards http://kmpi.konicaminolta.us/eprise/main/kmpi/content/about/AboutusNewsList


Reviews of A200

- megapixel.net http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loader.pl?p=http%3A//www.megapixel.net/reviews/minolta-a200/a200-review.html

more review links later

known issues and work-around - grainy EVF not useful for manual focus - slow, and sometimes wrong, focusing at low light - aggressive noise reduction? <shoot raw and use third-party noise reduction software> - unsatisfactory camera processing? <compare raw and extra fine and decide>


minor issues: - no landscape exposure mode <use manual focusing ring to set at infinity> - bulb mode at 30 seconds only