Difference between revisions of "Konica Minolta Dimage A200"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Reviews of A200 | Reviews of A200 | ||
− | - megapixel.net http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loader.pl?p=http%3A//www.megapixel.net/reviews/minolta-a200/a200-review.html | + | - megapixel.net |
+ | http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loader.pl?p=http%3A//www.megapixel.net/reviews/minolta-a200/a200-review.html | ||
more review links later | more review links later | ||
+ | |||
+ | known issues and work-around | ||
+ | - grainy EVF not useful for manual focus | ||
+ | - slow, and sometimes wrong, focusing at low light | ||
+ | - aggressive noise reduction? <shoot raw and use third-party noise reduction software> | ||
+ | - unsatisfactory camera processing? <compare raw and extra fine and decide> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | minor issues: | ||
+ | - no landscape exposure mode <use manual focusing ring to set at infinity> | ||
+ | - bulb mode at 30 seconds only |
Revision as of 15:44, 4 March 2005
Konical Minolta Dimage A200 won one of the DIMA 2005 Shoot-outs Awards http://kmpi.konicaminolta.us/eprise/main/kmpi/content/about/AboutusNewsList
Reviews of A200
- megapixel.net http://www.megapixel.net/cgi-bin/fs_loader.pl?p=http%3A//www.megapixel.net/reviews/minolta-a200/a200-review.html
more review links later
known issues and work-around - grainy EVF not useful for manual focus - slow, and sometimes wrong, focusing at low light - aggressive noise reduction? <shoot raw and use third-party noise reduction software> - unsatisfactory camera processing? <compare raw and extra fine and decide>
minor issues:
- no landscape exposure mode <use manual focusing ring to set at infinity>
- bulb mode at 30 seconds only