Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Japanese companies"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) m (→Time for a break-up?: typo) |
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (→Time for a break-up?: yes) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
As always, (a) it's less work to break up a growing category earlier rather than later; however, (b) recategorizing and then changing one's mind is a major waste of time (or worse). -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 04:19, 7 August 2006 (EDT) | As always, (a) it's less work to break up a growing category earlier rather than later; however, (b) recategorizing and then changing one's mind is a major waste of time (or worse). -- [[User:Hoary|Hoary]] 04:19, 7 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :That's a good idea. Maybe moving [[:Category:Camera distributors]] to [[:Category:Distributors]] is a good idea too. --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 04:57, 7 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:57, 7 August 2006
Time for a break-up?
There are lots of Japanese companies, and there promise to be plenty more, now that Rebollo fr and I are merrily creating stubs for Japanese distributors, etc. (Incidentally I don't think this is mere completism-fetishism; instead, it's a way to work out what the hell was going on in Japan -- what was related to what, who was related to whom -- in the thirties, forties and fifties.)
I think that Category:Japanese companies should be subcategorized as:
- Category:Japanese camera makers
- Category:Japanese lens makers
- Category:Japanese distributors (better, I think, than Category:Japanese camera distributors; but note the respective colors of Category:Camera distributors and Category:Distributors)
- Category: Japanese shutter makers
Though I think not:
What do others think?
As always, (a) it's less work to break up a growing category earlier rather than later; however, (b) recategorizing and then changing one's mind is a major waste of time (or worse). -- Hoary 04:19, 7 August 2006 (EDT)
- That's a good idea. Maybe moving Category:Camera distributors to Category:Distributors is a good idea too. --Rebollo fr 04:57, 7 August 2006 (EDT)
