Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Japanese companies"
(Time for a break-up?) |
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) m (→Time for a break-up?: typo) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Time for a break-up?== | ==Time for a break-up?== | ||
| − | There are lots of Japanese companies, and there promise to be plenty more, now that | + | There are lots of Japanese companies, and there promise to be plenty more, now that Rebollo fr and I are merrily creating stubs for Japanese distributors, etc. (Incidentally I don't think this is mere completism-fetishism; instead, it's a way to work out what the hell was going on in Japan -- what was related to what, who was related to whom -- in the thirties, forties and fifties.) |
I think that [[:Category:Japanese companies]] should be subcategorized as: | I think that [[:Category:Japanese companies]] should be subcategorized as: | ||
Revision as of 08:55, 7 August 2006
Time for a break-up?
There are lots of Japanese companies, and there promise to be plenty more, now that Rebollo fr and I are merrily creating stubs for Japanese distributors, etc. (Incidentally I don't think this is mere completism-fetishism; instead, it's a way to work out what the hell was going on in Japan -- what was related to what, who was related to whom -- in the thirties, forties and fifties.)
I think that Category:Japanese companies should be subcategorized as:
- Category:Japanese camera makers
- Category:Japanese lens makers
- Category:Japanese distributors (better, I think, than Category:Japanese camera distributors; but note the respective colors of Category:Camera distributors and Category:Distributors)
- Category: Japanese shutter makers
Though I think not:
What do others think?
As always, (a) it's less work to break up a growing category earlier rather than later; however, (b) recategorizing and then changing one's mind is a major waste of time (or worse). -- Hoary 04:19, 7 August 2006 (EDT)
