Difference between revisions of "Talk:Konica C35"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) (→Part removed: howto for editing conflicts) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:It is a problem when two people are working on an article at the same time. To avoid this, I sometimes add '''Work in Progress''' at the top of the page when I am heavily editing a long article. However, even when an editing conflict occurs, you don't lose your article completely: two windows appear, one with the text newly edited by the other contributor and another one (that appears only if you scroll down) with your text. You can cut and paste your text (second window) into the page (first window) and click "Apply". --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 13:16, 2 September 2006 (EDT) | :It is a problem when two people are working on an article at the same time. To avoid this, I sometimes add '''Work in Progress''' at the top of the page when I am heavily editing a long article. However, even when an editing conflict occurs, you don't lose your article completely: two windows appear, one with the text newly edited by the other contributor and another one (that appears only if you scroll down) with your text. You can cut and paste your text (second window) into the page (first window) and click "Apply". --[[User:Rebollo fr|Rebollo fr]] 13:16, 2 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes I saw that, but somehow my last two sections seemed to have gone! So I did them again. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I actually did what you suggested the second time and put "editing in progress as a heading! | ||
| + | |||
| + | He disgreed with a lot of my comments and on the whole I agree with him and have amended my text. However he was not totally right about everything and I think a reasoned discussion here is better than a public disagreement on the page! | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh yes, thanks for that titling help - have used that code ever since. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Do you agree about discontinuing the individual Konica C35 model pages and having a collective one. As the site is so sparse, I think a bit of "concentration" would help make it a better place to browse - long lists of models are just not something that captivate an audience! | ||
| + | |||
| + | Paul | ||
Revision as of 17:24, 2 September 2006
Part removed
I've just now removed:
- The first C35 was also available in black, but I have not seen the later model - presumably because the Auto S3 was avilable solely in this colour and they were trying to differentiate between the cheaper and dearer models.
There are two problems. First, "I" is meaningless in Camerapedia. Secondly, even if "I" were rewritten as "no editor of Camerapedia" -- which I don't recommend at all, but which would make a little more sense in itself -- I regret to say that I wouldn't understand what the resulting sentence meant. -- Hoary 10:58, 2 September 2006 (EDT)
Could you please not re-edit until I have finished - I now appear to have lost half the article.
I was trying to put the whole series in KOnica perspective and I appear to have lost 50% of my work!
I suggest in future awaiting at least an hour before editing something that you think is in process.
Minor revisions are not really that important!
Paul
- It is a problem when two people are working on an article at the same time. To avoid this, I sometimes add Work in Progress at the top of the page when I am heavily editing a long article. However, even when an editing conflict occurs, you don't lose your article completely: two windows appear, one with the text newly edited by the other contributor and another one (that appears only if you scroll down) with your text. You can cut and paste your text (second window) into the page (first window) and click "Apply". --Rebollo fr 13:16, 2 September 2006 (EDT)
Yes I saw that, but somehow my last two sections seemed to have gone! So I did them again.
I actually did what you suggested the second time and put "editing in progress as a heading!
He disgreed with a lot of my comments and on the whole I agree with him and have amended my text. However he was not totally right about everything and I think a reasoned discussion here is better than a public disagreement on the page!
Oh yes, thanks for that titling help - have used that code ever since.
Do you agree about discontinuing the individual Konica C35 model pages and having a collective one. As the site is so sparse, I think a bit of "concentration" would help make it a better place to browse - long lists of models are just not something that captivate an audience!
Paul
