Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canon Pellix"
(Comments on the Pellix)
Revision as of 19:16, 19 September 2009
Re. Cannon Pellix edit 18 September 2009:
There is surprisingly little difference with respect to noise and vibration between firing for example Cannon Pellix and Cannon Ftb, and the shutter vibration would in any case be much the same. Certainly, the Pellix has no mirror vibration. The fact that the shutter employs metal curtains is relevant, and removing it is degrading the content of the article.
The pellicle mirror is the key factor enabling Canon to accomplish the TTL feature, this fact should not be suppressed. The Canon Pellix may be a clever construction, but hardly elegant, the mirror being in the light pass during exposure and degrading the resultant image, and even more so as it is degraded over time. There is hardly any Pellix in usable condition around with its original pellicle mirror. This is much more serious fault than the mirror vibration in any comparable Canon SLR.
The light loss is in the region one third stop, which hardly qualify for a major disadvantage description.
This article is written in British English, an acceptable alternative language at Camerapedia.
With respect, Jan