Difference between revisions of "Nikon D100"
Rebollo fr (talk | contribs) |
(rewriting, e.g. to avoid insulting a cited review (If it deserves citing, why insult it?)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Released in 2002, the D100 filled the same "prosumer" niche as Canon's D60 and Fuji's S2 Pro. It | + | Released in 2002, the '''Nikon D100''' filled the same "prosumer" niche as Canon's D60 and Fuji's S2 Pro. It has a 6.1 megapixel sensor and the usual set of features you'd expect to find on a dSLR that costs so much. It has recently become redundant, in the opinion of many, because of the introduction of the D70, which, although costing less, offers many of the same features and even improves on a couple (1/500 flash sync speed for example). |
==Reviews== | ==Reviews== | ||
| − | *[http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond100/ DPreview.com review the D100 | + | *[http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond100/ DPreview.com review the D100 in great depth] |
*[http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d100.htm Ken Rockwell gives his unbiased opinion] | *[http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d100.htm Ken Rockwell gives his unbiased opinion] | ||
Revision as of 05:02, 10 June 2006
Released in 2002, the Nikon D100 filled the same "prosumer" niche as Canon's D60 and Fuji's S2 Pro. It has a 6.1 megapixel sensor and the usual set of features you'd expect to find on a dSLR that costs so much. It has recently become redundant, in the opinion of many, because of the introduction of the D70, which, although costing less, offers many of the same features and even improves on a couple (1/500 flash sync speed for example).
Reviews
Photoblogger's using the D100
Nikon Cameras
