Difference between revisions of "Nikon D100"
Lukewinter (talk | contribs) m (→Reviews) |
Lukewinter (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==General== | ==General== | ||
| − | Released in 2002, the | + | Released in 2002, the D100 was nikon's answer to canon's 10D. It features a 6.1mp sensor and the usual raft of features you'd expect to find on a dSLR that costs £1,200+. It has recently become redundant, in the opinion of many, beacause of the introduction of the d70 that- although costing less- offers many of the same features and even improves on a couple of the D100s (1/500 flash sync speed for example) |
==Reviews== | ==Reviews== | ||
| − | *[http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond100/ DPreview.com review the | + | *[http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond100/ DPreview.com review the D100 is stupid amounts of depth] |
*[http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d100.htm Ken Rockwell gives his unbiased opinion] | *[http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d100.htm Ken Rockwell gives his unbiased opinion] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Photoblogger's using the D100 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[http://www.durhamtownship.com/ Kathleen Connally] | ||
| + | *[http://g4lamos.buzznet.com/ g4lamos] | ||
Revision as of 20:49, 25 November 2004
General
Released in 2002, the D100 was nikon's answer to canon's 10D. It features a 6.1mp sensor and the usual raft of features you'd expect to find on a dSLR that costs £1,200+. It has recently become redundant, in the opinion of many, beacause of the introduction of the d70 that- although costing less- offers many of the same features and even improves on a couple of the D100s (1/500 flash sync speed for example)
Reviews
