Difference between revisions of "Nikon D100"
Lukewinter (talk | contribs) |
Lukewinter (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==General== | ==General== | ||
− | Released in | + | Released in 2002, the d100 was nikon's answer to canon's 10D. It features a 6.1mp sensor and the usual raft of features you'd expect to find on a dSLR that costs £1,200+. It has recently become redundant, in the opinion of many, beacause of the introduction of the d70 that- although costing less- offers many of the same features and even improves on a couple of the d100s (1/500 flash sync speed for example) |
==Reviews== | ==Reviews== | ||
[http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond100/ dpreview review the d100 is stupid amounts of depth] | [http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond100/ dpreview review the d100 is stupid amounts of depth] | ||
+ | [http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d100.htm Ken Rockwell gives his unbiased opinion] |
Revision as of 20:41, 25 November 2004
General
Released in 2002, the d100 was nikon's answer to canon's 10D. It features a 6.1mp sensor and the usual raft of features you'd expect to find on a dSLR that costs £1,200+. It has recently become redundant, in the opinion of many, beacause of the introduction of the d70 that- although costing less- offers many of the same features and even improves on a couple of the d100s (1/500 flash sync speed for example)
Reviews
dpreview review the d100 is stupid amounts of depth Ken Rockwell gives his unbiased opinion